NEED ADVISE - financial issue
- Thread starter hubbylubby998
- Start date
silensiozo
New Member
Why is there so much hostility in the forum now? I am sure there are many distressed souls here who need some sort of advice and comfort, not mockery and silly, sad jokes...
Can't we all live in peace? The world will be a better place minus the senseless talk, quarrels and attacks!
Can't we all live in peace? The world will be a better place minus the senseless talk, quarrels and attacks!
silensiozo
New Member
Scope Guy, contrary, you are the one kidding yourself.
Please do mind your language n have some self respect. I worry for you, as you are unaware of the effect of your words and maybe you have find no peace in your confused mental state and you are venting it all out here.
Take a deep breathe and be calm when you post anything. The consequences are out there and will come back in a circle.
There are people here at this forum, with disturbed situations too, all they need are sincere advice and i don't see it in any of your postings. Maybe its the tone you put your opinions in.
If you think the internet is not cultured, that is because you prefer to see it this way, the world is in your mind, so please treasure your mind and make meaningful use of it, please be very very careful.
Please do mind your language n have some self respect. I worry for you, as you are unaware of the effect of your words and maybe you have find no peace in your confused mental state and you are venting it all out here.
Take a deep breathe and be calm when you post anything. The consequences are out there and will come back in a circle.
There are people here at this forum, with disturbed situations too, all they need are sincere advice and i don't see it in any of your postings. Maybe its the tone you put your opinions in.
If you think the internet is not cultured, that is because you prefer to see it this way, the world is in your mind, so please treasure your mind and make meaningful use of it, please be very very careful.
yesno333
Member
One of this days everyone in this forum should just stop using personal attack against one another...if u dun like someone post, just attack his content..dun rope in the person, family watsoever blah blah...wat's the point..there will definitely be so much less quarrels this way....zZzzz
Silensiozo,
You just miss the whole fun. LOL~
To a bunch of cultured people, you of course mind your langauge.
To a bunch of morons... you just get some fun. What else?
Learn to adapt. è§äººè¯´äººè¯ï¼Œè§moron说moronè¯ã€‚
You want me to say nice things, first the forum has to change.
You just miss the whole fun. LOL~
To a bunch of cultured people, you of course mind your langauge.
To a bunch of morons... you just get some fun. What else?
Learn to adapt. è§äººè¯´äººè¯ï¼Œè§moron说moronè¯ã€‚
You want me to say nice things, first the forum has to change.
miloice
Well-Known Member
Silensiozo, its not really simply about the language used. There will be always a variety. However, there are people that come with other agendas and motives. Not everyone is willing to sincerely offer advise. Some are OBVIOUSLY looking for other motivations in forums.
silensiozo
New Member
Milo i agree with you, its basically the mind state, which i continually stress.
A restless and disturbed mind produces bad motive and hence bad language. The mind is really powerful, if one is really calm and happy, nothing bad will come out from their mouth, so i sort of pity those who don't mind their gap and spill sadness, jealousy, anger and disturbing content... it only reflects their troubled state of mind.
They have no ability to distinguish good and bad.
Scope... beware your é¬¼è¯ may turn you into 鬼...
Eventually you will have no compassion/kindness to others and hence others will have none for you... and that is the root of your sufferings. The fun you find in being this way has a grave price to pay, because you have no mental consciousness.
A restless and disturbed mind produces bad motive and hence bad language. The mind is really powerful, if one is really calm and happy, nothing bad will come out from their mouth, so i sort of pity those who don't mind their gap and spill sadness, jealousy, anger and disturbing content... it only reflects their troubled state of mind.
They have no ability to distinguish good and bad.
Scope... beware your é¬¼è¯ may turn you into 鬼...
Eventually you will have no compassion/kindness to others and hence others will have none for you... and that is the root of your sufferings. The fun you find in being this way has a grave price to pay, because you have no mental consciousness.
silensiozo
New Member
Also, if you think there are only morons here, why are you here? Instead of asking others to change, why don't you, being so "mighty", make the conscious change yourself?
Just a suggestion from a "moron", haha.
yesno333
Member
Just make peace la everyone....everyone comes in to this forum with a piece of their mind....everyone have the rights to contribute to this forum...it does not means that it differs from the rest it is wrong or right...who are we to judge wrong or right...just make peace and let everyone say their piece...if u dun agree with them...let it be....ppl looking at this forum most likely are able judge which pc of advice suit them more....ZzZZz
Personal attack on one another will just breed more and more hatred among urselves..it will never ends....or should we just change it to singaporehatred.com forum.....><"
Personal attack on one another will just breed more and more hatred among urselves..it will never ends....or should we just change it to singaporehatred.com forum.....><"
silensiozo
New Member
You change for your own good and your own happiness, not to make them happy.
I am sure no one can have any kind of fun with arguments and anger. It's commendable that you have intentions to help, but try give your advice kindly and clearly.
Do not throw in unneccessary jokes/mockeries or personal attacks, that will lead nowhere, it only add stress to the person who is seeking out help here. I am sure if its your problem in discussion here, you don't want someone to make it all seem like a circus right? Kind of hurting for the TS.
I am sure no one can have any kind of fun with arguments and anger. It's commendable that you have intentions to help, but try give your advice kindly and clearly.
Do not throw in unneccessary jokes/mockeries or personal attacks, that will lead nowhere, it only add stress to the person who is seeking out help here. I am sure if its your problem in discussion here, you don't want someone to make it all seem like a circus right? Kind of hurting for the TS.
silensiozo
New Member
Trust me, its a truth. I am very sure of it. There is no happiness when there is no inner peace and clarity. Unless "hell" is interpreted as fun, then i have nothing to say.
Silensiozo,
Psychological instability is usually more entertaining than a straight curve.
There is nothing about anger or arguments here. Most of them are nosensical to me. While it is very hard to offend me, it is very easy to fall into the class called moron in my view.
I need entertainment, Silensiozo my dear. What best to extract from a forum of low IQs who can't even think proper but prefer to argue nosensically?
Didn't you watch 60sec, watching and Denise80's idiotical exchanges? Hehehe~
What they find acceptable is actually pretty stupid. And that entertains. Besides, they reject the element of true love readily, and screamed and advise on relationship matters...
So ridiculous. If they are not morons, who are they? LOL~
Psychological instability is usually more entertaining than a straight curve.
There is nothing about anger or arguments here. Most of them are nosensical to me. While it is very hard to offend me, it is very easy to fall into the class called moron in my view.
I need entertainment, Silensiozo my dear. What best to extract from a forum of low IQs who can't even think proper but prefer to argue nosensically?
Didn't you watch 60sec, watching and Denise80's idiotical exchanges? Hehehe~
What they find acceptable is actually pretty stupid. And that entertains. Besides, they reject the element of true love readily, and screamed and advise on relationship matters...
So ridiculous. If they are not morons, who are they? LOL~
silensiozo
New Member
If you get angry on what others say, think or express, its like a pebble dropping into a bowl of water, the water spills out readily. Try throwing the same pebble into the lake, u get only a slight ripple. If you throw it into the sea, the pebble disappears almost instantly.
That volume of water is like our hearts. Its not a matter of exterior situation, its a matter of inner volume.
Why do you need to get involved in the clatter that happens outside your world? Worse still, in the cyber world, where people are not consciously acting the way they should, while hiding behind some usernames.
Your life can't be this boring right?
As said, i will stop my postings on this thread now, there are more important things to do in real life.
That volume of water is like our hearts. Its not a matter of exterior situation, its a matter of inner volume.
Why do you need to get involved in the clatter that happens outside your world? Worse still, in the cyber world, where people are not consciously acting the way they should, while hiding behind some usernames.
Your life can't be this boring right?
As said, i will stop my postings on this thread now, there are more important things to do in real life.
My life is indeed very boring.
Singapore is tiny. Good food are scarce. Good places are few. And I dislike Singaporeans. Ever since I returned to Singapore... it's like coming back to hell. LOL~
Yet for private matter I can't leave.
It's not my heart, my heart can't be bothered with morons. However, the ripple as you said can be entertaining. That was why we tossed pebbles into ponds when we were young.
I don't get angry with them. Do you think I am angry with Denise80?
Don't force yourself an unnatural stop when there is no need to. What can be more important than to be entertained? LOL~
Singapore is tiny. Good food are scarce. Good places are few. And I dislike Singaporeans. Ever since I returned to Singapore... it's like coming back to hell. LOL~
Yet for private matter I can't leave.
It's not my heart, my heart can't be bothered with morons. However, the ripple as you said can be entertaining. That was why we tossed pebbles into ponds when we were young.
I don't get angry with them. Do you think I am angry with Denise80?
Don't force yourself an unnatural stop when there is no need to. What can be more important than to be entertained? LOL~
susanna_low
New Member
Some come in with smarty pants quotes, some come in to encourage confrontation, some come in under the guise of achieving world peace. Some kitties look in the mirror and see a roaring lion. *chuckle*
If someone were to tell me, "Look in the mirror ! " to which I will, I will ask, "Mirror, mirror, on the wall.....who is almost as retarded amongst them all ?"
signing off, kitty softpaws
If someone were to tell me, "Look in the mirror ! " to which I will, I will ask, "Mirror, mirror, on the wall.....who is almost as retarded amongst them all ?"
signing off, kitty softpaws
Signing in.....
Mirror cries,
"Miss smarty-pants "plagiarizes".
Miss pageant sings, "We are the world". While at it, she does her <strike>faggoty</strike> beauty queen wave.
Gladiator instigator promotes violence at someone else's expense. Busting one ball is not enough, have got to bust both his balls.
Amongst them....there is one who is almost as retarded as MiLo Of tHe ReTaRds who by the way makes you wanna gauge out your eyes."
*cackle*
Mirror cries,
"Miss smarty-pants "plagiarizes".
Miss pageant sings, "We are the world". While at it, she does her <strike>faggoty</strike> beauty queen wave.
Gladiator instigator promotes violence at someone else's expense. Busting one ball is not enough, have got to bust both his balls.
Amongst them....there is one who is almost as retarded as MiLo Of tHe ReTaRds who by the way makes you wanna gauge out your eyes."
*cackle*
You left out one.
There's Ms Perfect who critically pointed out the following:
"Miss smarty-pants "plagiarizes".
Miss pageant sings, "We are the world". While at it, she does her faggoty beauty queen wave.
Gladiator instigator promotes violence at someone else's expense. Busting one ball is not enough, have got to bust both his balls.
Amongst them....there is one who is almost as retarded as MiLo Of tHe ReTaRds who by the way makes you wanna gauge out your eyes."
There's Ms Perfect who critically pointed out the following:
"Miss smarty-pants "plagiarizes".
Miss pageant sings, "We are the world". While at it, she does her faggoty beauty queen wave.
Gladiator instigator promotes violence at someone else's expense. Busting one ball is not enough, have got to bust both his balls.
Amongst them....there is one who is almost as retarded as MiLo Of tHe ReTaRds who by the way makes you wanna gauge out your eyes."
LoL..your overemphasis on clear messages and good english that many of us do not possess leads me to this advice for you:
Wimps deny this 'is' - Subject-verb disagreement
Syntax is wrong.
'whacking' - wrong use of the meaning of word here
Lexically is also wrong
Never point out others' mistakes if you yourself couldn't stay perfect, Ms Perfect. We openly admit to our mistakes in tying, language etc. What about you? Opps, I forgot you're Ms Perfect and you always see yourself as such no matter what. Ms Perfect is always in her self-denial perfect world.
Wimps deny this 'is' - Subject-verb disagreement
Syntax is wrong.
'whacking' - wrong use of the meaning of word here
Lexically is also wrong
Never point out others' mistakes if you yourself couldn't stay perfect, Ms Perfect. We openly admit to our mistakes in tying, language etc. What about you? Opps, I forgot you're Ms Perfect and you always see yourself as such no matter what. Ms Perfect is always in her self-denial perfect world.
" `Wimps deny this 'is' - Subject-verb disagreement. Syntax is wrong."
-You're begging the question. Subject is plural: wimps, verb is also in plural form: deny. 'is' isn't the verb here. You're looking absolutely dumb.
"'whacking' - wrong use of the meaning of word here. Lexically is also wrong."
- Lexically wrong ? Not according to Thesaurus.
I cannot commend your desperate effort in taking "whacking" literally to build a case against me instead of going into the subject of striking at me just as when I was leaving. Something cowards do......
Hee....coming in when a group of people is mentioned. The other day, I was just telling how some people subscribe to the concept of safety in numbers.
Ms Perfect is always in her self-denial perfect world.
- Check again missy........ careful there.
Please talk a bit more.....you're engaging in me.
-You're begging the question. Subject is plural: wimps, verb is also in plural form: deny. 'is' isn't the verb here. You're looking absolutely dumb.
"'whacking' - wrong use of the meaning of word here. Lexically is also wrong."
- Lexically wrong ? Not according to Thesaurus.
I cannot commend your desperate effort in taking "whacking" literally to build a case against me instead of going into the subject of striking at me just as when I was leaving. Something cowards do......
Hee....coming in when a group of people is mentioned. The other day, I was just telling how some people subscribe to the concept of safety in numbers.
Ms Perfect is always in her self-denial perfect world.
- Check again missy........ careful there.
Please talk a bit more.....you're engaging in me.
I'll sure have to educate you a bit more.
"Wimps deny this is..."
"Subject is plural: wimps, verb is also in plural form: deny. 'is' isn't the verb here. You're looking absolutely dumb."
Oh dear, there's a lot to educate you here and if you're really not good at this, you should really have not tried because my answers to you will make you realise your folly in no time. Okay...here it goes...
Sure, 'Wimps' are plural and the plural verb 'deny' does go with it well but NOT when you have 'is' later on. Frankly, you tried having two clauses in one sentence here when you obviously failed to execute it accurately because of your limited knowledge of grammar.
The correct sentence should be...
"Wimps denying this are..."
In the above, 'denying this' is a post-modifier of 'Wimps'.
or it should be...
"Wimps who deny this are..."
In the above, 'who deny this' is another clause with the main verb 'deny' and the other clause you have above in the same sentence is where 'Wimps' and 'are' agree with one another.
Didn't your high school teacher tell you 'is' is always a verb? hahahahhahh
Anyway if my analysis above is too profound for you, do consult your primary / secondary school teacher because all these are too basic. I didn't even want to tell you that even the word 'deny' is in the wrong form because I thought you seriously missed out on 'who' or the '-ing' due to typo. Now I truly understand it's your poor knowledge of grammar here.
As for 'whacking', whether it's the literal use or otherwise, you've wrongly used the word here. The literal meaning is 'hitting' and hitting is one verb that requires an object which you didn't even include. May I know how have you creatively used 'whacking' here to describe wimps?
Frankly, despite knowing so much myself, I do make mistakes too because c'mon, this is the internet! It's a forum! And the best part is, no man is infallible! There's no need to harp on all these but hey, you're one hell of an idiot who always picks on others when it comes to typo, poor or obscure language when you yourself made your language so inaccessible with all the crazy grammatical mistakes that you didn't even think exist. You're pathetic because you didn't even realise your lack of grammar knowledge here and still dare to be a blabber mouth all the time telling people off about 'contexts' and poor use of language! LOL!
Last but not least, you badmouthing many others in one post doesn't make you a hero or 'brave' person by the way. A person who bullies others with nasty words and name-calling here is one with inferiority complex.
I came out of nowhere to teach you a lesson, albeit an English Language lesson hahahaha, so that you would learn your own mistake and reflect upon it. Think twice before you accuse others like Milo and I(ya ya...whatever subscription to safety numbers la hahahahaha) for language mistakes or failing to provide a context to help others understand our posts.
Till now, I seriously don't know what you meant by the following:
"Wimps deny this is whacking." Wow, so cheeeemmm hahahahahahah
"Wimps deny this is..."
"Subject is plural: wimps, verb is also in plural form: deny. 'is' isn't the verb here. You're looking absolutely dumb."
Oh dear, there's a lot to educate you here and if you're really not good at this, you should really have not tried because my answers to you will make you realise your folly in no time. Okay...here it goes...
Sure, 'Wimps' are plural and the plural verb 'deny' does go with it well but NOT when you have 'is' later on. Frankly, you tried having two clauses in one sentence here when you obviously failed to execute it accurately because of your limited knowledge of grammar.
The correct sentence should be...
"Wimps denying this are..."
In the above, 'denying this' is a post-modifier of 'Wimps'.
or it should be...
"Wimps who deny this are..."
In the above, 'who deny this' is another clause with the main verb 'deny' and the other clause you have above in the same sentence is where 'Wimps' and 'are' agree with one another.
Didn't your high school teacher tell you 'is' is always a verb? hahahahhahh
Anyway if my analysis above is too profound for you, do consult your primary / secondary school teacher because all these are too basic. I didn't even want to tell you that even the word 'deny' is in the wrong form because I thought you seriously missed out on 'who' or the '-ing' due to typo. Now I truly understand it's your poor knowledge of grammar here.
As for 'whacking', whether it's the literal use or otherwise, you've wrongly used the word here. The literal meaning is 'hitting' and hitting is one verb that requires an object which you didn't even include. May I know how have you creatively used 'whacking' here to describe wimps?
Frankly, despite knowing so much myself, I do make mistakes too because c'mon, this is the internet! It's a forum! And the best part is, no man is infallible! There's no need to harp on all these but hey, you're one hell of an idiot who always picks on others when it comes to typo, poor or obscure language when you yourself made your language so inaccessible with all the crazy grammatical mistakes that you didn't even think exist. You're pathetic because you didn't even realise your lack of grammar knowledge here and still dare to be a blabber mouth all the time telling people off about 'contexts' and poor use of language! LOL!
Last but not least, you badmouthing many others in one post doesn't make you a hero or 'brave' person by the way. A person who bullies others with nasty words and name-calling here is one with inferiority complex.
I came out of nowhere to teach you a lesson, albeit an English Language lesson hahahaha, so that you would learn your own mistake and reflect upon it. Think twice before you accuse others like Milo and I(ya ya...whatever subscription to safety numbers la hahahahaha) for language mistakes or failing to provide a context to help others understand our posts.
Till now, I seriously don't know what you meant by the following:
"Wimps deny this is whacking." Wow, so cheeeemmm hahahahahahah
Dear Teacher (even if you are not mine),
My story, narrated in brief-third person goes, "Low life scum announces exit....only then wimps whack. Wimps deny this is not whacking."
- "this" is referred to the action of creeping up from behind to assault (yeah...pick on this) when the other person turns his back to leave.
The sentence which you desperately tried to analyze is preceded by a description of what was happening.
-"is"(singular) is a verb to "this"(singular) brings forth a straw man argument against subject-verb disagreement.
First you tell me I erred on subject-verb agreement, then you proceed to change the structure of the sentence, going into one big round to try to insert a second clause in the "correction" you made but you don't tell how the sentence should have ended (the second clause). You just leave an open-end. Your chain of arguments is to mislead you've made a mistake. Oh, I shudder to think what will happen to our children judging by how you "educate". Just like the Japs who rewrite history books, denying the atrocities done to the Chinese. So freaking deceitful.
"As for 'whacking', whether it's the literal use or otherwise........."
-This is the second time you are avoiding the subject of assaulting/whacking when I turned my back on you. You write anything but that.
"...nasty words and name-calling here is one with inferiority complex."
-Mirror, mirror on the wall. What are "mule" and "low life scum" amongst them all ?
"Think twice before you accuse others like Milo and I...for language mistakes..."
- I never accused you of making language mistakes !
- It is "Think twice before you accuse others like Milo and ME." (this is not an accusation because it is true, I can even prove it) I thought twice, thrice and more...*snigger*. Just laughable how you tell me to think twice on the subject while making a common pronoun error in the same breath. Oh dear teacher, if you had not inserted Milo, you could have avoided falling flat on your face. How peculiar for a teacher to go into subject-verb disagreements, post modifiers.....erring on something as simple as subjective and objective pronouns.
"Frankly, despite knowing so much myself, I do make mistakes too"
-Oh, cut the fluff, that is insurance against future mistakes to acquit yourself. Who doesn't know people mistakes for crying out loud ? You need to tell me that ?
My story, narrated in brief-third person goes, "Low life scum announces exit....only then wimps whack. Wimps deny this is not whacking."
- "this" is referred to the action of creeping up from behind to assault (yeah...pick on this) when the other person turns his back to leave.
The sentence which you desperately tried to analyze is preceded by a description of what was happening.
-"is"(singular) is a verb to "this"(singular) brings forth a straw man argument against subject-verb disagreement.
First you tell me I erred on subject-verb agreement, then you proceed to change the structure of the sentence, going into one big round to try to insert a second clause in the "correction" you made but you don't tell how the sentence should have ended (the second clause). You just leave an open-end. Your chain of arguments is to mislead you've made a mistake. Oh, I shudder to think what will happen to our children judging by how you "educate". Just like the Japs who rewrite history books, denying the atrocities done to the Chinese. So freaking deceitful.
"As for 'whacking', whether it's the literal use or otherwise........."
-This is the second time you are avoiding the subject of assaulting/whacking when I turned my back on you. You write anything but that.
"...nasty words and name-calling here is one with inferiority complex."
-Mirror, mirror on the wall. What are "mule" and "low life scum" amongst them all ?
"Think twice before you accuse others like Milo and I...for language mistakes..."
- I never accused you of making language mistakes !
- It is "Think twice before you accuse others like Milo and ME." (this is not an accusation because it is true, I can even prove it) I thought twice, thrice and more...*snigger*. Just laughable how you tell me to think twice on the subject while making a common pronoun error in the same breath. Oh dear teacher, if you had not inserted Milo, you could have avoided falling flat on your face. How peculiar for a teacher to go into subject-verb disagreements, post modifiers.....erring on something as simple as subjective and objective pronouns.
"Frankly, despite knowing so much myself, I do make mistakes too"
-Oh, cut the fluff, that is insurance against future mistakes to acquit yourself. Who doesn't know people mistakes for crying out loud ? You need to tell me that ?
<interjecting>
"Low life scum announces exit....only then wimps whack. Wimps deny this is whacking."
I believe what Watching means is:
Wimps will 'whack' (ie. appear and fight) only when the Low life scum leaves. However, wimps will not consider this action as a 'whack' - whatever that implies. Fighting back, perhaps?
"Wimps deny this is whacking". The subject is "this". And "this" refers to the action.
"Low life scum announces exit....only then wimps whack. Wimps deny this is whacking."
I believe what Watching means is:
Wimps will 'whack' (ie. appear and fight) only when the Low life scum leaves. However, wimps will not consider this action as a 'whack' - whatever that implies. Fighting back, perhaps?
"Wimps deny this is whacking". The subject is "this". And "this" refers to the action.
hahahahah...thanks, matka, for your interjection. I FINALLY know what that silly person was trying to craft grammatically. Then again, your explanation is not exactly accurate. The main subject and verb are still 'wimps' and 'deny'. 'this is whacking' is the sub-clause that silly person is referring to. But you're right about 'this' refers to the action earlier. Despite being a layman like her, you were at least clearer to me so thanks you!
Watching, here's another lesson for you. If you really are not sure or good, don't try too hard. I doubt you even know how to put clauses in a sentence properly, something which even Primary school kids do pretty well these days. So here's another lesson for you...
"Wimps deny this is whacking."
NOW I finally understand your main clause is 'Wimps deny something' and that 'this is whacking' is your sub-clause' that functions as the 'object' of the sentence. Don't understand? Nevermind..let's move on.
The WHOLE problem with you is, you forgot one super duper important word!
The correction should be as follows:
"Wimps deny THAT this is whacking."
OR
"Wimps denying this is whacking are ....."
Can you now see why your own posts are full of mistakes and confusions? And when I wasn't able to understand you, you even claimed that I feigned ignorance previously? Duh!
Something as simple as this....you obscured the meaning with your silly construction that's grammatically wrong.
'Wimps deny this is whacking' can be expressed correctly in many different ways:
1. Wimps deny THAT this is whacking. (where deny is the main verb and NEVER stupidly claim that 'is' is not a verb hahahahahahah)
2. Wimps denying this is whacking are ....
OR another meaning:
1. Wimps who deny this are whacking... (where 'are whacking' becomes the main verb)
2. Wimps denying this are whacking...
I've already said this is a forum/internet and there's no need to harp on language slips even if you're a lawyer, teacher or professor. If authors of books are so damn good, they wouldn't need so many rounds of editing, idiot. The whole problem with you is, you LOVE to laugh at people so I'm now highlighting to you your own problems.
I agree with you that low-life scum is demeaning but it's the most apt description for someone like you who stalk people for language errors when you're 'half-past six' (hahahhaha still can't help but to think about your crazy grammar). I used mule as a metaphor - as stubborn as a mule. Haven't you heard? Oh god, did you even attend school? Yet, I've never heard of 'faggots' or 'lesbians' who are fond of playing with two different genitals being used in essays as 'politically correct' or 'polite' (even as compared to low-life scum). You stalked people in the forum, read about their unpleasant experiences in the past and then bring them up to hurt people. What kind of a freak are you? Since when did I say I love being a lesbian, particularly because I am fond of playing with two different genitals? C'mon, I'm waiting for your apology for being so rude if not get out of here. I'm also waiting for you to apologise in this forum that you're imperfect and thus you apologise for highlighting others' language errors. Lastly, you HAD highlighted my 'language mistakes' or 'typo' errors before but perhaps you've done this too frequently to many here that you don't even recall.
Watching, here's another lesson for you. If you really are not sure or good, don't try too hard. I doubt you even know how to put clauses in a sentence properly, something which even Primary school kids do pretty well these days. So here's another lesson for you...
"Wimps deny this is whacking."
NOW I finally understand your main clause is 'Wimps deny something' and that 'this is whacking' is your sub-clause' that functions as the 'object' of the sentence. Don't understand? Nevermind..let's move on.
The WHOLE problem with you is, you forgot one super duper important word!
The correction should be as follows:
"Wimps deny THAT this is whacking."
OR
"Wimps denying this is whacking are ....."
Can you now see why your own posts are full of mistakes and confusions? And when I wasn't able to understand you, you even claimed that I feigned ignorance previously? Duh!
Something as simple as this....you obscured the meaning with your silly construction that's grammatically wrong.
'Wimps deny this is whacking' can be expressed correctly in many different ways:
1. Wimps deny THAT this is whacking. (where deny is the main verb and NEVER stupidly claim that 'is' is not a verb hahahahahahah)
2. Wimps denying this is whacking are ....
OR another meaning:
1. Wimps who deny this are whacking... (where 'are whacking' becomes the main verb)
2. Wimps denying this are whacking...
I've already said this is a forum/internet and there's no need to harp on language slips even if you're a lawyer, teacher or professor. If authors of books are so damn good, they wouldn't need so many rounds of editing, idiot. The whole problem with you is, you LOVE to laugh at people so I'm now highlighting to you your own problems.
I agree with you that low-life scum is demeaning but it's the most apt description for someone like you who stalk people for language errors when you're 'half-past six' (hahahhaha still can't help but to think about your crazy grammar). I used mule as a metaphor - as stubborn as a mule. Haven't you heard? Oh god, did you even attend school? Yet, I've never heard of 'faggots' or 'lesbians' who are fond of playing with two different genitals being used in essays as 'politically correct' or 'polite' (even as compared to low-life scum). You stalked people in the forum, read about their unpleasant experiences in the past and then bring them up to hurt people. What kind of a freak are you? Since when did I say I love being a lesbian, particularly because I am fond of playing with two different genitals? C'mon, I'm waiting for your apology for being so rude if not get out of here. I'm also waiting for you to apologise in this forum that you're imperfect and thus you apologise for highlighting others' language errors. Lastly, you HAD highlighted my 'language mistakes' or 'typo' errors before but perhaps you've done this too frequently to many here that you don't even recall.