scopeguy, i thought those are quite interesting questions from u! Quite a different view from us. On the other hand, I cannot totally agree with what you say about true love and test and etc. What if the man is a psychopath/sociopath, is someone who finds pleasure in hurting people, etc? Is it not the other party's right to protect himself/herself from the abuser? There are seriously horrible people out there, and sometimes regardless of how true the love is, one can get seriously damaged staying on in a toxic relationship.
Nonetheless, I thought this true love thing is an interesting perspective. May I share with you guys the role of extra-marital affairs (EMA) seen from the family therapy/marital therapy perspective?
Dyads (two people) are actually unstable relationships that can become close and distant at various points of time. In a marriage, the couple tries to recreate the perfect mother/maternal love he/she experiences as a baby, and thus invest all his/her energy, time, love in it, and this is often the most loving time in the marriage. Before they know, they have become so close that they are dependent on each other and functions as a 'we' instead of 'I's. Now this loss of self can be very scary, and usually one party will either cling harder or distance himself/herself to feel less scared. This movement causes the other party to feel scared of the change (that the spouse is pulling away, or is too suffocating). The pair then keeps 'dancing' according to how he/she had been brought up. If the mother of the man had been totally dependent and domineering of him, he will see that his wife is currently trying to engulf him as well, and will try to distance himself from her. It is of no chance that the wife will be someone whose parent(s) are quite distant, and she has always felt rejected by them. She now sees his 'cooling off' as a rejection of her and tries to cling harder.
Both parties start to feel really uncomfortable and maybe angry with each other, but they can't voice out the frustration because they are scared of losing each other. In family therapy, the pair who is stuck then tries to get outside help by pulling a third person in, and there you have the third party. Triangles are more stable than dyads, and each can take turns in playing roles as the persecutor, victim and rescuer. It can start as simply as complaining about the spouse. The man gets another woman, the wife gets another man, the husband starts an affair with his work, and the wife has an 'affair' with the kids. In this way, both parties can avoid facing each other and their problem, and pushes the problem to the 3rd party.
With the 3rd party found, the cooled off marriage may suddenly heat up. Both parties who are still in love with each other tries hard to save their marriage (crisis time), and tries different methods to interact with each other. Unfortunately, if the pair does not solve the root problem in their avoidance, they will keep bringing in new 3rd parties to relieve their stress. It can be a child who suddenly acts up, so that the parents can stand together in alliance (that's why I get to see so many children...mostly scapegoats of their parent's marital problems), mother-in-law, etc.
Interesting huh?
Then again I must make a qualifier...what I described is of a NORMAL marital relationship that is based on love and belongingness. If what you have is a pathological relationship with a person with PDs, then please take care of yourself!
Nonetheless, I thought this true love thing is an interesting perspective. May I share with you guys the role of extra-marital affairs (EMA) seen from the family therapy/marital therapy perspective?
Dyads (two people) are actually unstable relationships that can become close and distant at various points of time. In a marriage, the couple tries to recreate the perfect mother/maternal love he/she experiences as a baby, and thus invest all his/her energy, time, love in it, and this is often the most loving time in the marriage. Before they know, they have become so close that they are dependent on each other and functions as a 'we' instead of 'I's. Now this loss of self can be very scary, and usually one party will either cling harder or distance himself/herself to feel less scared. This movement causes the other party to feel scared of the change (that the spouse is pulling away, or is too suffocating). The pair then keeps 'dancing' according to how he/she had been brought up. If the mother of the man had been totally dependent and domineering of him, he will see that his wife is currently trying to engulf him as well, and will try to distance himself from her. It is of no chance that the wife will be someone whose parent(s) are quite distant, and she has always felt rejected by them. She now sees his 'cooling off' as a rejection of her and tries to cling harder.
Both parties start to feel really uncomfortable and maybe angry with each other, but they can't voice out the frustration because they are scared of losing each other. In family therapy, the pair who is stuck then tries to get outside help by pulling a third person in, and there you have the third party. Triangles are more stable than dyads, and each can take turns in playing roles as the persecutor, victim and rescuer. It can start as simply as complaining about the spouse. The man gets another woman, the wife gets another man, the husband starts an affair with his work, and the wife has an 'affair' with the kids. In this way, both parties can avoid facing each other and their problem, and pushes the problem to the 3rd party.
With the 3rd party found, the cooled off marriage may suddenly heat up. Both parties who are still in love with each other tries hard to save their marriage (crisis time), and tries different methods to interact with each other. Unfortunately, if the pair does not solve the root problem in their avoidance, they will keep bringing in new 3rd parties to relieve their stress. It can be a child who suddenly acts up, so that the parents can stand together in alliance (that's why I get to see so many children...mostly scapegoats of their parent's marital problems), mother-in-law, etc.
Interesting huh?
Then again I must make a qualifier...what I described is of a NORMAL marital relationship that is based on love and belongingness. If what you have is a pathological relationship with a person with PDs, then please take care of yourself!