alan_golfnut
New Member
Whoa, so many questions to answer! *lol*
Northgal: I did my Bachelor in Education (Health & Physical Education) in Australia, where I also got my trainer cert. Am now trying to complete my MSc in Exercise & Sports Studies. Frankly, it's opening up a can of worms with regards to criteria for picking a PT. Okay, qualifications wise, on one end of the spectrum, you'll have people like myself and my chaps at the consultancy with all the academic background and also experience. And on the other end, you'll have the chaps who did their 17-40 hours of lectures with the SSC (who form the majority). And in the middle, you'll have the trainers with qualifications from various sources, some good, some not so good. Some require you to sit for a whole week of full day lectures before sitting a supervised exam, while others you simply just download the syllabus off the Net and so an online exam. Of cos, the people along this spectrum will charge different amount, and understandlebly so, issue of value for money.
Then there's experience, which is really a dodgey matter. What makes a good instructor? Someone with a lot of experience but no qualifications? Or someone with little experience but with the qualifications? The instructor with all the papers will base his programmes on scientific research, but will he know how to adapt the programme to suit different clients? The instructor with the wealth of experience might have all the tricks to help the client, but are they scientifically sound so that it won't cause any long term harm to the client?
Lastly, the mannerism of the PT. Do you like the 'traditional' type of PT who'll tell you pain is good and has the belief that one style fits all, or do you prefer the sort who would listen to your feedback and adopt various strategies to encourage you?
Was talking to my golf pro last night, and he was telling me that the golf association here is also going through the doldrums, with a local club deciding to hire cheaper pros who got their licence after attending a weekend course. The existing pros who had to spend years doing apprenticeship (but they cost more too) naturally got cheesed off and quit enmasse.
Northgal: I did my Bachelor in Education (Health & Physical Education) in Australia, where I also got my trainer cert. Am now trying to complete my MSc in Exercise & Sports Studies. Frankly, it's opening up a can of worms with regards to criteria for picking a PT. Okay, qualifications wise, on one end of the spectrum, you'll have people like myself and my chaps at the consultancy with all the academic background and also experience. And on the other end, you'll have the chaps who did their 17-40 hours of lectures with the SSC (who form the majority). And in the middle, you'll have the trainers with qualifications from various sources, some good, some not so good. Some require you to sit for a whole week of full day lectures before sitting a supervised exam, while others you simply just download the syllabus off the Net and so an online exam. Of cos, the people along this spectrum will charge different amount, and understandlebly so, issue of value for money.
Then there's experience, which is really a dodgey matter. What makes a good instructor? Someone with a lot of experience but no qualifications? Or someone with little experience but with the qualifications? The instructor with all the papers will base his programmes on scientific research, but will he know how to adapt the programme to suit different clients? The instructor with the wealth of experience might have all the tricks to help the client, but are they scientifically sound so that it won't cause any long term harm to the client?
Lastly, the mannerism of the PT. Do you like the 'traditional' type of PT who'll tell you pain is good and has the belief that one style fits all, or do you prefer the sort who would listen to your feedback and adopt various strategies to encourage you?
Was talking to my golf pro last night, and he was telling me that the golf association here is also going through the doldrums, with a local club deciding to hire cheaper pros who got their licence after attending a weekend course. The existing pros who had to spend years doing apprenticeship (but they cost more too) naturally got cheesed off and quit enmasse.