Should i Divorce pls read and give me advice

ä¸å¯ç†å–».

Yeah, as if I know Kerin, as if I should suddenly drop by at Kerin's, as if I can start preaching at her house...

Denise80, in case you still have some brains left... why don't you drop by Lee Kuan Yew's home and start preaching about Wei Ling's need to find a mate?

You are CRAZY.
 


Bingo. You don't even know her. How could you claim that ppl in this forum had given her negative advice and therefore did not help her???

I for one didn't claim to know Wei Ling but you cited someone whom you seem to know very well. If you don't know that person then keep quiet. If you don't even know the ppl who gave her the advice, then keep quiet. If you do not cite ridiculous examples, people will not point this out to you too.

The more you cite, the more wrong you make - simple logic that your pea brain can't quite pick up. Sad.

And that ä¸å¯ç†å–» just describes you cos you don't even know her, don't even know the forum people who chatted with her here and you made one big sweeping statement that they influenced her negatively?
 
"It's also very obvious she was making news and more news and yet... I don't see how great professional help people claimed to love her had given her."

Freaking lame. Mind you, she attempted suicide before eventually succeeded ending her life. Its obvious all the alarm bells were there for her loved ones. STOP lying and rubbing salt to her family. SICKO.

Name one GREAT professional that can guarantee to prevent all their patients from suicide. The fact that the person has commit suicide doesn't give any conclusion that nothing was done to help her. Its not about having a brain or not... Its simple integrity. Stop twisting and lying.
 
When the fock have I said Kerin received advises from this forum?

You don't read, did you?

I simply said, Kerin had friends in this forum with big mouths... useless big mouths who can't be of help to her but talk like they are so great.

Besides... you can't even read and assume like a loose cannon, do you think Thomas should be around here to be misled round and round and round...

If he does have something to reflect on, he'd need to think hard coming back here.
 
Hi everyone,
I have read a few post on this forum. Can the arguing stop? People are posting threads asking for advise. Each of us are entitled to our own advise. Please do not attack each other and messing up the threads.
 
Milo, well said. In fact, even the best doctor in the world can't guarantee anything. And as human beings who ain't perfect, we'll never dare to make sweeping statements like he did. He did it with poor justification and when he lost the reasoning, he calls others names. This is truly an ungentlemanly behaviour, that of a sore loser.
 
Again... prove it...
"Kerin had friends in this forum with big mouths... useless big mouths who can't be of help to her but talk like they are so great."

Did you know her friends that are in this forum??Identify just one and quote just one thread that they talk like they are so great. Oh... you are so frank? Liar. Stop lying.

"talk like they are so great" reflects you completely.
 
Hi Helen...

You believe in the One and true love? LOL~

Denise80,

Cut the crap~

You can't even understand Don nor make sense of Thomas, and you are talking about reasoning?

LOL~

You are a true moron~

LOL~
 
LoL..it's funny how he claims not to know Kerin but he knows she has friends in this forum, somemore with big mouths that are useless and that they 'talk' like they are so great hahahhahhaha....he's one hell of a self-contradicting chap...guess he missed his medications...

So...yes...prove it. Name her friends and show us HOW they talked with big mouths and WHAT they said? Pls..we are all waiting.

Anyway I think if her friends are really reading this, they might just come in here to bash him up.
 
Watch your mouth, Milo.

Yes. She had friend/s in this forum. But who am I to pull her hand up?

Use your bloody brain for once?

Denise80,

Waste of time talking to you. Go and bluff those stupid children... I am going for a walk.

But it's real entertaining... You people are really sickos.
 
Milo, he's escaping from the sweeping statement he made as usual. No integrity at all. No wonder he's a 'romantic' guy...just need to use honey words to con women but every word he shoots off his mouth, he doesn't really mean them and couldn't prove it.
 
More bullshit... lolz...
unless her friends that talk big had all their posts deleted by the admin, you can surely quote.

If you cannot, by what stupid logic did you come to that conclusion her friend in this forum talk big? The only thing you are continuing to prove is either you are a damn bad liar or you are unable rationalize. i.e. you are crazy. Go see a shrink.
 
Scope, you need to watch your mouth instead. You hurt Kerin's friends, whoever they are, by making such groundless and unpleasant statements. Hope you're able to sleep peacefully tonight.
 
Can't I even take a walk? You think I am like you morons?

This small forum is only part of my entertainment, and I don't need to answer to morons.

You are crazy, Denise80. You are nutcase, Milo. I have already proven it, and you people just won't repent. How shameless...
 
Fine.

I know you are here. I read you here, Ms Kerin's friend...

If you are here, just let those morons know.

If you think I am wrong to say that, but it's my view.

Focking pestering morons...
 
You badmouthed friends of a deceased person for entertainment? Just scram and go for your walk. Rem to return to apologise to the friends of Kerin here.
 
Finally, you admitted you have zero knowledge about the very people involved but being such a prideful smartalec to bullshit so much crap.
 
Mind you Milo, I never said Scope reads and writes WELL. You´ve got to hate him so much that any semblance of tilting the balance back is perceived as me being devil´s advocate (defending Scope in case you don't get what I mean). That comment of Scope having better reading skills got derailed into you feeling a dent in your ego. (surely you understand that getting a dent doesn´t mean I bust your balls.)

I really can´t help your insufferable intelligence to understand sarcasm, ie LOTR. Of course there is no LOTR at Singapore Brides ! You really live up to your reputation of reading things black and white Milo. By default, you are a true blue literal automaton. When someone says he sailed the seven seas, you´d think he really had a yacht and saw sharks while sailing.

You tell me I am not clear with my preference for flowery language, then you proceed to debate for me that creativity brings value. Let me rephrase what you wrote to illustrate my point about you being incongruous. What´s with that ambiguity ? To be on the safe side ?
-"Just quoting a recent example, your analogy of LOTR. Well, you might feel it´s witty to do a LOTR analogy because it would be clearer THAN plain simple english. More ever, it has a different effect and impact. The LOTR analogy brings to the point about the context and intent. There are situations one need not require clear concise communication and that creativity brings value."

Even when you try to amend what you wrote, you leave me hanging in the air, close to zero clarification despite that lengthy post. I don´t do faultless writings myself but I aim to be coherent at least. You once asked me to help you write better, when I point out the errors, you say I won´t let go. Oh puh-lease.......(sarcastic spelling to emphasize , understand ?)
 
Watching, I have nothing against flowery words. What I'm pointing out to you that we need to look at the context and intent. There are situations to be generic and when to be clear and concise.

On one hand, despite clarifying it was a casual remark and there isn't a need to read so much into it, you went into long exchanges and suggestions. On the other hand, you chose to throw in a witty sarcasm as you deem fit. This is the contradiction I'm pointing to you.

You exercised your discretion on when to be concise and when to be flowery and ambiguous in your own messages. At the same time, you did not give others that same discretion. I see that blaring double standards.

Denise is able to understand what I wrote while you didn't. Have you pondered why?

When I asked of you to give me the feedback, I had gladly accepted them in situations I agreed with you. I didn't say I would somehow obediently take in 100% regardless. A year back when you spoke of scope's behavior and how I had drove him to away, I reflected. Now, it is clarify by himself that he went away because his account was banned and that he went overseas and only returned recently.

Look at his recent behaviors while I had mostly ignored his post except to calm Denise down. It is only yesterday when he crossed the line to repeatedly make use deceased Kerin misfortune for his own intent to insult others in the forum.
 
To add, please substantial your suggestion
"That comment of Scope having better reading skills got derailed into you feeling a dent in your ego. (surely you understand that getting a dent doesn´t mean I bust your balls.)"

Referring to your post yesterday at 8:39 pm:
Well.....Scope does write some nice things like helping someone to propose when nobody would, he reads beter than some people. It´s just when he crosses the line, all the good things get undone making it a waste of his effort.

You clearly pointed
1) Scope does writes nice things, giving Don's example.
2) he reads beter than some people
3) Its JUST he crossed the line... all the good things undone.

Your comments completely ignores the obvious. The good is undone not by this single incident, but his continuous insults, name callings and accusations that he dishes at others that refuked his comments. Also, on how he discredits others comments as rubbish despite him also mentioning them in his own advises.

So, why would you completely leave that obvious fact out of your statement? His good has already been undone by his own behavior all the long. The statement clearly trivialize all the negativity he has predominantly displayed and shifted it all this incident. Tell me, how not to perceive that as a biased statement? Ever since scope's return, who else have dished out more posts? How many were good and how many were just insults?

I surely don't hate him, I have ignored the many other posts by him. Unlike clark that copy and paste that same message everywhere.
 
Milo,

You are really dimwitted. It's not a name calling or insult, it's a point I made. Got it?

You are dimwitted, moron~
 
Milo....

All these time, you actually thought I was asking you to be articulate......If you don´t grasp the elementariness, how to strive to be articulate ? I´m starting to think it´s not just a language thing for you. It´s comprehending. I am experiencing a serious eye sore from the erroneous writings. This flowery remark, "how about checking the neuronal circuits in your brain ? ", not too sarcastic to comprehend I hope ? Funny you say I exercise this and that, when the issue is about being coherent in speech. I never forbade your long-windedness (coupled with clarifications that leave you hanging in the air).

Dent in your ego ? Proven by your comment, I, watching, won´t let go. You indeed never denied the fallacious comments. Not denying doesn´t necessary mean no dent in your ego. You just wish I would turn a blind eye to how you phrase things that get interpreted wrongly or why there are no opaque colors in your lenses, just like those old colorless tvs.

You are clutching on to Scope this, Scope that. You are obsessed with him. You think I am an anarchist/pacifist for/against the busted one ? What you want is for me to bust his ass. Mister, go do your own fighting. I already implied it is distasteful to use Kerin. I never trivialized Scope´s doings. That remark about his good gets undone is when he starts off nicely, it often derails into something nasty. Good becomes bad, waste of effort, capische ?

Yeah, drag Clark into this, you mentioned you thought Clark and Scope are not the same people. You want me to convince you otherwise ? Stand on your own two feet and go fight with Clark lah ! And really, there´s no need to tell me you were trying to calm Denise down because I don´t give two hoots if you do.

I never said you drove Scope away a year back. You confused me with someone else. Shooting blanks in the air...
 
"Yeah, drag Clark into this, you mentioned you thought Clark and Scope are not the same people."

Its pretty obvious why I mentioned Clark... he is one chap that followed me everywhere in this forum like a broken recorder. You turned complete blind eye to that fact. Instead, gave more irrelevant suggestions again. Its really obvious the wave lengths is completely not in line. What I wrote is simple, but you have to link it again is strange interpretations AGAIN.

"You are clutching on to Scope this, Scope that. You are obsessed with him."
Not that same accusation again. I'm addressing your double standards in your comment that we are disputing on. Or should I also make the same suggestion about your obsession to read into my messages in twisted and strange manners?
 
"I already implied it is distasteful to use Kerin. I never trivialized Scope´s doings"

I repeat
"His good has already been undone by his own behavior all the long. The statement clearly trivialize all the negativity he has predominantly displayed and shifted it all this incident."

What you have implied to him is only about this incident. That doesn't at all contradict what I'm pointing out about your statement.

and I repeat
"Your comments completely ignores the obvious. The good is undone not by this single incident, but his continuous insults, name callings and accusations that he dishes at others that refuked his comments. Also, on how he discredits others comments as rubbish despite him also mentioning them in his own advises."

Read properly.
 
"I never said you drove Scope away a year back. You confused me with someone else."

Well maybe, what's important is about the feedback and reflection and not who had said it. So, its no blanks.
 
Hi Milo and Watching, like I've said...it really depends on our own background knowledge and the two persons' language competencies. Sometimes, I'm lost in your writing too, Watching. There are times I'm lost in Milo's. Then there are times I'm not clear myself. It all depends on context. I don't think Milo is the type who's always not comprehensible. To me, perhaps only 10% of the time I don't get him and that could be because I am either tired or not following the thread closely. And don't classify me as Group A when I make this post. It's freedom of speech.
 
"Dent in your ego ? Proven by your comment, I, watching, won´t let go. You indeed never denied the fallacious comments. Not denying doesn´t necessary mean no dent in your ego. You just wish I would turn a blind eye to how you phrase things that get interpreted wrongly or why there are no opaque colors in your lenses, just like those old colorless tvs."

What does ego has to do with this?!? It has to do with frustration. Yes, I hope you can for once... stop being so obsessed over interpreting my comments irregardless of context and importance. If your eyes hurts this much, then don't scrutinize it so hard to come up with so many interpretation and posts. Your suggestion of ego has the negative connotations that I am trying to hide. I already told you very clearly but you just don't let go and instead thinking otherwise. This is extremely ridiculous. So, what you do you suggest? You be my PA for this forum to vent through everything I write first? I don't want to give you sore eyes though.
 
Milo, we were talking about language that touches on Scope, then suddenly Clark and Denise are inputs.

It´s counter-effective to just copy and paste sentences to convey whatever perspectives you have. It makes you look stunningly unintelligible. ".........by this single incident...."
-You expect me to be on every thread eyeing Scope like a hawk to comment on him ? You think an additional person pouncing on him is going to make a difference ? You claim I am biased when I too have commented about Scope linking entertainment to someone's death. That, you overlook. If you like your reason that I discriminate Scope positively, part of you is sick and a larger part of you is an idiot. You give me 2 options, put my intellect at zero if I defend him or join in the bandwagon to lynch him because you'd like me to. I will only talk to Scope as and when I deem fit, not because you question me.

Just ludicrous how you reframe your original statement to "Well maybe, what's important is about the feedback and reflection and not who said drove Scope away". Sway to the left, sway to the right, do the hokey pokey and we are back to square one. You cannot let Scope out of your system. (hokey pokey is sarcasm, in case you catch no ballz)

At that thread where you talked about Scope and forumers in general, you explain as little as possible when I ask about it. No real clarifications, hope the errors go unnoticed. Talk about Scope, switch to forumers in general, go back to talking about Scope again. Crazy haphazardness ! I mentioned before, it's not a sin to make a mistake in judgment. That can be forgiven. But covering up, hiding the first mistake all because you there is a dent in your ego, that´s another thing. (now, don´t go saying I won´t let go when you brought up that ego thing ahhh...) Go ahead and seek allegiance in fine prints, drag Denise in, ask why only she understands you and I don't.

Your consecutive posting to me is telling....so agitated to be preoccupied with me every 15 minutes (or less). Or is it because you are impulsive ?
 
you see... just because you didn't see the relevence, it becomes somehow incoherent.

My message to you is really really simple. Why is that Denise is able to understand my message since it is as incoherent as you claim? Have you reflect on this very simple fact? This is my feedback to you. Think about it instead of going on and on.

You have claim that I hated Scope so much, which I pointed out to u that I had mostly ignored his many post. Unlike another poster, Clark that clearly displayed a far stronger behavior. Yet, you are completely fine with that. Said nothing to him about his rubbish behavior. At the same time, you have to dig at me and accuse me of hating scope etc.

my reply to you at 04 Nov 2011 5:32 am wasn't incoherent as well. You have that habit and expectation that somehow things have to be written how you would like to read instead of really trying to understand what was written.

You had requested me not to edit or add on my messages. Here I am, writing the comments in different post and still you commenting. The feedback totally ridiculous.
 
you had expressed your confusion over certain points specifically which I quoted them again for you with explanations... and it become counter productive. This exchange is indeed counter productive. Think all you want then. bye.
 
AH ~ Fat, ugly and like to stalk pple Milo !

how many times must i focking tell you ???

My friends call me clark, YOU can call me SUPERMAN.

I am execising my freedom of opinion.

YOU ARE AN ASS WITHOUT A HOLE. Tt's why you are so full of shit Milo.
 
When I asked you not to edit, I meant not changing the structure of the original post. A twister at heart who reformulates original statements into something else.....

It was unnecessary to include Denise to tell me that I do not understand your writing, you just have to resort to externalities. I´d think someone who has done 12 K entries would have the courage to stand on his own instead to appealing to others inconspicuously for help. Some peoples´ confidence level surge up when they are not alone battling it out.

Keep asking what about this, what about that, what about infinity ? Your need to expand to Clark to prove your point that I am biased is due to your primary concern to build a case against me. Thing is, you could have mentioned whatever perceived discrepancy about Clark several posts ago but you do that only after you run out of resources about discriminating Scope positively. Smeagol and Gollum ring the bell ? Oh no, you literal automaton, you could not connect the points.
 
Morons are morons.
Dimwitted are dimwitted.

Nothing to do with my poor character and upbringing for people to be morons and dimwitted. LOL~

I deem it fair judgement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top