Can a marriage survive without SXX? Please help to advise.

Childish? LOL~

Denise80,

Allow me to remind you that you are the one talking about flaming. And if this is not debate, what were you doing? Arguing against an avatar?

If that is love, if this love needs spicing up or else... By the way, doesn't that mean without spicing up, it's not that 'love'? Hmmm...

The One's definition is definitely not about looks. Haven't I said that already?

No. You were the one who told that to Tina... complaining that your own sex should be better. Denise80, are you sure you are not arguing for the sake of arguing? Why don't you re-read your own pieces?

Yes. Your hubby is reading this. But remember, I do not decide for the forumers. When I correct Paperboat, I am backed up by science. When I talked about sex urge, I am backed up by science. When I talked about loveless marriage, I am more than backed up by the high divorce rate... and the many madness in this forum.

So if your hubby is reading this... he should have told you nicely that you are going nowhere. Your assumptions are totally out of track. LOL~

The essence of this all is very simple...

You really imagine your man too much. What... You think those women whose men strayed never got whispering of sweet nothings, tickling each other... even to give husbands allowance?

Please, Denise80... You-are-a-teacher. Please talk sense. Thanks. No offence.

Look at what you told Tina, look at your... approach here. LOL~ You are in a mess, trying to argue your way out, trying to defy gravity, trying to fight science and mother nature, and trying to convince yourself everything is ok. And your husband is not stopping you even if he is reading this. LOL~

Like I said, you at least should have a school library. Why don't you do some basic research, darling?

And why do you think you brought up 'flaming'?

So...

Is your husband reading this and telling me you are the one who is not childish? LOL~

Go and sleep, Denise80. Refresh your brain abit, then we talk again?
 


Your condescending tone does not sit well. If you need to learn one skill, please let it be the art of convincing people. At this point, you are convincing no one but yourself.

What a waste of bandwidth.
 
Matka, in comparisons with his 'experiments' and avatar talk a year ago. This is very mild liao. lolz

Weekend is just around the corner. Cheers.
 
Matka,

Nay. I am not here to convince people. Never heard one thing... 'Trying to argue with women is a waste of time'.

In Singapore, given the low cultural level, trying to reason even with science is useless.

Besides...

Convincing people is not my objective here. Even if presenting them with a psycho test, presenting the whole issue before their eyes is pointless.

We are just avatars to each other... let's keep it that way.
 
I failed to mention derogatory as well.

Milo, yes the weekend is soon here again. I'm enjoying life and appreciating every moment as it is. Cheers.
 
"When I correct Paperboat, I am backed up by science. When I talked about sex urge, I am backed up by science. When I talked about loveless marriage, I am more than backed up by the high divorce rate... and the many madness in this forum."

Haven't you heard before that 'silence doesn't mean consent/agreement?'

I haven't read anyone who agreed with you wholly as yet. Lee disagreed with u, Paperback disagreed with u, I disagree with you..wow, not enough to give you the teeny weeny hint that your view is skewed?

Who are you to decide if I should go sleep now and refresh my brain or not? My hubby reads these, thinks you're crap but he's not me who would point out you're crap.

Anyway, I've complained my sex could be better for babies making and you still didn't get the point where I said my hubby and I are comfy with the frequency if not for babies making. You'll just pick on the complaint, blow it up and assume my hubby would soon go for some sweet young thing which is entirely ridiculous.

Backed by science when correcting paperboat? Then back by science with your 99% women claim. The day you could do that, I believe the 99% here will suddenly 'wake up' (in your definition) and see 'the light'..meanwhile..Yawnn...you are the one who insisted I can't debate and you could. When asked to back by data, you quickly turned away and said this is no school debate.

If sleeping helps me refresh my brain a bit, you know what? Sleeping doesn't even help you a teeny bit because you're totally in your own world of 1%. If that's the case, why come here and try so hard to convince us, the 99%?
 
Denise80,

I DUN NEED Paperboat's agreement or consent when I corrected her. It's basic science!

And I don't need anyone to agree with me. LOL~

Then your hubby does have a problem. LOL~ He's reading you going nowhere and still isn't aware?

Like I said... if you can find me 50% of the women who will be with men without the need of marriage... you can easily rebut me. LOL~

It doesn't really matter, Denise80. But I do expect more from teachers. LOL~

Singapore... it's a place full of madness...

And am I here trying hard to convince you? I don't have to, and it's not my purpose for coming here.
 
Matka,

LOL~

Singapore... a crazy piece of island with so many funny people... ...

Anyway, I'd eventually migrate, so you guys can kiss each others' asses and fantasize your 'true love'.

You guys are just suckers for a system... in my honest view. And why should I think like you people?

That's derogatory to me. See?

Worthless... to be honest.
 
Fat Milo ? Gollum calls Samwise Gamgee Fat Hobbit.

Gollum tells his alter ego Smeagol,`Give us The One, my precious...we wants it`. Scope and Clark are the mirror image of the creature from Lord of the rings !
 
Ahh..Matka's posts just add on to one more who doesn't agree with you, Scope. No wonder you have to take 'silence' as consent. That way, you'll have 99% votes right, avatar?

Sure...we are suckers for a system and it's derogatory for you to think like us. We are worthless to you...so why are you talking to worthless ppl like us? Precisely I'm a teacher and I don't even think a teeny bit well of you. Usually I'll think everyone is this world deserves a chance to redeem themselves. You're beyond cure, Scope. Milo was kind by saying you've mellowed down. All it takes is a few 'debates' (in your words) to get you. If we agree we are worthless and that you're anyway not here to 'convince' us, then what are you waiting for? Go back to your planet LoL...but hey, some things you talked about what heavens, mortals thingy...really suggest you may be mentally unstable (I'm serious and not joking)...you may have to see a psychologist / shrink or something
 
Where are all the 'zhen yi gan' folks?? lolz. All talk talk for a few days and disappear for good.

As much as you may dislike his tone. Such posts drive the criticism straight in. Irregardless if it is appreciated or appropriate. This forum needs a few slaps in the face. Not everyone will engage with you with respect & the intent to help. There are occasional good messages within still despite all the ego flexing self praises.

Enjoy folks.
 
Haven't you realised fat, ugly and like to stalk pple milo that nobody missed you !

This forum is dead because of regulars like you. Shitty powder and Stupid SM has left !

WHAT ABT YOU ??????????? GET THE HELL OUT OF THIS FORUM NOW !!
 
Ah....fat, ugly and like to stalk pple milo,

You want to pally with the others now ??? Not a chance ! New and Future members should know what an ASS you are.

Other forummers are discussing like what they should. They dun need you to judge how good or bad the discussion is !!!!!!

You are seriously sick. You notice nobody bothers abt yr posts anymore ???
 
Denise80,

You seem to be very bothered about how many believed the Church and nobody believed in Galileo for the benchmark... LOL~

Denise80, that's no way to try wiggle out.

I thot only PAP will try send opponents to IMH... LOL~

It's all goodwill, darling.

You sure your hubby is not trying to stop you? Again, you are a teacher, show some respect to yourself. I sense that you have been pushed to the corner... Further discussion or debate won't be necessary... other than for fun.

I suppose Darin Gal now realises her problem. Hehehe~

Mortal, take it easy.
 
"As much as you may dislike his tone."
-If you start with, "as much as...", you do a follow up in the same sentence instead of a immediate full stop. To start off, whose tone ? Hard to kick off the old habit no head, no tail.

"Such posts drive the criticism straight in."
- Which posts drive criticism straight in ? By who ? The vagueness is to motivate the person to
come back ?

"Not everyone will engage with you with respect & the intent to help."
-I thought the paragraph is about a mysterious person who drives criticism straight in ?

"There are occasional good messages within still despite all the ego flexing self praises."
- Sounds like you´re talking about someone in particular.

After the aligning the rhetorical questions, maybe I know what and who you are talking about.
 
Look at the current context lah. I'm talking about scope. rhetorical? u r thinking too much. There is no lord of the rings.

Surely u r not thinking its clark. lolz
 
Fat, ugly and like to stalk pple milo,

Dun you get it ? You are not welcome in this forum anymore.

Get the hell out of here !!!!!
 
You mean to say, "Fat, ugly and like to stalk pple milo, drive the criticism straight in ? "

Tell me you don´t think Scope is Clark. Just a simple yes or no will do.

Mind not using third person forms like "he" and then switch to a specific "you", very haphazard hor if you intend on talking about one person in one paragraph.
 
It is really a very simple message. You are thinking too much to break it up into different parts and linking different meanings behind them.
 
Your first reply to me, you tell me it was about Scope, you "omitted" saying "you" is a general you. Now you come around and tell me, there were 2 parts in one paragraph which I thought sounded off-key on Friday, your chain of arguments is ambiguous and haphazard. Having said that, there is no link to "not everyone will engage with <font color="ff6000">any forummer</font>....(I substituted "you" with "any forummer" because you now say it is a general you)...with respect &amp; the intent to help" and "Scope driving criticism straight in". You break up your own messages. I wouldn´t be "thinking so much" if you were neater in your ways.

Please clarify, "No, I don´t". Is it an answer to the question, "Tell me you don´t think Scope is Clark" or "You mean to say, "Fat, ugly and like to stalk pple milo, drive the criticism straight in ? " "
 
"Tell me you don´t think Scope is Clark. Just a simple yes or no will do"

As requested, i have given you a simple no. Its really not complicated. So, is there anything still so confusing?
 
That, "No, I don´t" could be an answer to "You mean to say, "Fat, ugly and like to stalk pple milo ", drive the criticism straight in ?" as well. One answer but two questions.

You quietly drift away, no comments about the questionable link. Let´s make your words a bit more transparent from the onset and align them visually better.
a1. Not everyone will engage with you with respect &amp; the intent to help.
a2. Not everyone will engage with forumers with respect &amp; the intent to help.

b1. Such posts drive the criticism straight in.
b2. Such posts by Scope drive criticism straight in. (why you think Scope drives criticism straight in beats me)

How not to be confused when you intertwine Scope with other forumers ? Maybe you want to explain the modifications, maybe you want to go to obscurity, I dunno. Technical mistakes or grammatical mistakes of the like can be forgiven but to cover up the first mistake is another thing. If you admit error, I hope you don't need a face saving strategy that it was I who did this to you.
 
Face saving? come on.
its really this simple. you didn't catch it initially. Its fine. You find that confusing, also no issue.

we can clarify. Its really just about scope.

So now that is clear.

If you intend to add all your interpretations as well. fine with me too. it is your interpretation not mine.

Cheers
 
To add, it just a general comment about the forum. I don't see what the big hoohaa is about.

there are many ways to word it. It isn't something so important to be phased in the most careful way.

Score doesn't bother to refute or substantiate, he just puts across his own views.
 
That particular paragraph did not come across like a joke and sounded badly put together. Of course, that is only my opinion and opinions are subjective.

If little effort is taken to form messages clearly or to read properly, you can slip into non-critical expressive customaries. It's not a one-time thing and it will put you continuously off track. A poster may have the best intentions but if his/her "expressive skills" are lacking, it´s going to be blurry when communicating with others.
 
Clear or blur, its not important. Its a very casual remark about the irony in the forum so don't take heart to it. If its a serious discussion that I'm engaging with you as we had in other discussions, I'm glad to clarify and elaborate. One doesn't need to have the best linguistic skills before voicing out. For this one, I'm just luffing it off.
 
I have been reading Watching and Milo...

Why is a small tiny minute issue non-related to matter of the heart dangling like shit wanting to drop yet refusing to be dropped...? LOL~
 
Climax gone already mah, I could not stimulate Milo´s urges to defecate at me.....so it went back to his bowels. He is exercising restraint. *Cackle*

You expert at shitting ah ?
 
Nobody got more shits than Superman. That's why he's super.

If this world isn't full of shits, we don't need Superman.
 
Scope, take your pinkie out of his ass at once, you are clogging the natural flow ! You horny kaleidoscope, summore got to go analyze peoples´ sex life.
 
Watching,

It's better than just jacking off porns. LOL~

Analysing is my hobby, and it keeps my brains sharp... too sharp.

These girls are crazy enough... we guys shouldn't be. So~ break up, chill, go fock spiders, let the shit drop lah~

Hmmm...

More crazy women PLEASE!!! LOL~

I just love to see them wiggle... even if they don't make sense!
 
Clark,

Sometimes when it goes overboard, won't be fun leh~

Actually I am very interested to read your views on these matters.

Why do you people like to flame so much? I never could understand.
 
you wanna to know Superman's views ?

OK.....sex is a necessaity in a marriage. Both males and females requires it on a physical and emotional level.

Even Superman was once in love with Superwoman.
 
nope...we are from the same planet.

I am now with Lois.

The breakup was horrid. Long story.

Feel like farting now.
 
Tina, if you are physically healthy and in your 20s or 30s, don't you think something is not right that you have zero sexual desire?
 


Doll,

It is possible in women that some women after pregnancy due to psychological or intermediate hormonal reasons suffer from super low sex drive.

The one known solution is a romantic husband.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top