hi laundry,
of cos Porn is not Money... the emphasis is on the PPLE, not the product... if u do get my point.
my emphasis is on the PPLE who say Money is Evil, not that Money is Evil... and it's on the pple who say Porn is Evil, and not Porn being evil...
if this point is not even understood, then the whole flavour of argument sways without any possibility of reconciling.
when i first started on the posting there, i mentioned "it's not the words that corrupts the mind, it's the mind that corrupts the words"... the same sentence has different meaning to the different pple who view it. the material itself is Dead, it's a Constant... it's the humans looking at it that turns it into a subjective material.
he judges pple based on the viewership of porn which he personally feels is Evil. it is Not Wrong for him to feel porn is evil, but it is wrong for him to judge pple who watch porn as peeping toms etc... this point HAS to be established.
the only reason he has given is 'Porn is Evil', but this is based Entirely on on his perception of porn. now show the same porn to another... this other person acknowledges the existence, knows its purpose, knows it's illegal, but dun go all ballistic over it becos it is just another part of living.
the reaction makes the difference... not the material... never the material.