Hi MinHue, sure, I'll be happy to share. Please keep in mind though, that this is based on my opinion and different photographers have different ways of working.
OK, so let's see, the difference in equipment for the way I approach documentary photography is that I'll be starting to use Leica rangefinder cameras to document the entire wedding as opposed to solely using digital slrs. These cameras are well known for being discreet and great for capturing moments because they are extremely responsive cameras so that's a big plus for photojournalistc style.
However, they are terrible cameras to use with a flash, which means that in order to get the best light, I need to move. The problem with group shots is that it's impractical and in many cases impossbile to move 10 person to get everyone perfectly aligned with the light. I mean you could, but you'd spend the rest of your wedding just to get that 1 group shot.
The next plus of the Leica cameras is that they have incredible lenses, especially for documentary approach. However, they don't make zooms for the cameras I am using, so it means I'll have to walk closer or further away to get the shot. But after the last 2 years of experience, i ifnd myself getting better shots when I physically move closer rather than just standing there zooming my lens in and out which is what i used to do. Doing so brings about a certian intimacy with the subject which is so vital in documentary wedding photography.
Using the Leicas means I'll have to use film, so next year I will have to go back to film and adjust my workflow accordingly. While it may seem like a small change from the outside, it has huge implications for me and my suppliers. It now means that i can now offer some albums I could not in the past, but it also means some albums I offered in the past is no longer available.
However, more than just a change in gear, the use of film and leicas is also a change in philosophy in the way I approach wedding photography. Using film and leica cameras really slows down the way I shoot. And this is great for me because instead of machine gunning everything with a digital camera which is what many wedding photographers do today, I want to create images with depth and meaning, which means I need to force myself to slow down and think during a wedding instead of shooting mindlessly.
This more mindful way of shooting is also translated into a more mindful way of editing my wedding images. Next year, i really want to spend much more time on my images during the post production and printing stage, not just to give beautiful color and shaprness, but to create images that have more depth and meaning in them by using a more interpretive way of printing them.
How is this different for the consumer? Well, first, it means that I will be shooting far fewer weddings next year. I'm estimating only 2 per month. Of course this is terrible for my business and it would likely wipe out most of my profit margin, but then again, I'd rather be producing art than money anyway.
I will be paying more individual attention to each wedding and spending maybe 4 weeks on post production rather than the current 2. I believe the product the client receives would be closer to fine art with a more unique signature look and this is my long term vision for my wedding photography. i hope someday my images would be so beautiful and profound that it would not look out of place hanging on a gallery wall or on the client's wall next to some great piece of art.
Well, hope i answered your question. I'm looking forward to next year.... :0p