While it is true that some people are abusing the system that is protecting women. I have heard many stories from social workers of irresponsible men that goes to very extreme measure to avoid their contribution to supporting the children. Not justifying the disparity, but there is a reason why the rules were in place. There are 2 sides to it. Probably it needs to be reviewed, to abolish it, I guess not. Some laws are in place, and intended to be exercised only for cases of clear irresponsible individual.It still favours women. These are just minor amendments made to WC. How about when it is the girl who find another bf outside after marriage? why must guys still pay maintenance in this case? How about a case when the girl actually abuse the guy repeatedly by hitting, scratching him and even want to smother him to death? In all these cases, men are still deemed at fault if the marriage breaks down.