As for the unfinished business Milo, when you accused me of entrapping, it is absurd how someone who seriously falls short in reading can read entrapment. When Mirrorcelcius put forth an entrapment (the sex plea) with comprehensible (but deliberate) Ah Beng-fluency in an encrypted clause (albeit a funny one), it slipped through your fingers. Do you really have the acumen to discern what entrapment is, Milo ? Can you decipher secret messages, if any at all ? Initially I thought it was just a language thing that blinded you when you accused me but it came to my attention you lack cognition skills. But those aren´t the driving forces for citing entrapment. You harbour ill-will when you foisted entrapment on me. I´ll tell you why.
You saddle your misrepresentations of things on me when there was a group. And when I establish you misread, not only do you pull the houdini act on that; you uncover your warts by slyly shifting your story to something else. Note, the latter, is a falsification of records. In your own terms: "twisting and turning". It isn´t so much about misreading but covering up and worse......you tamper with your story and put the blame on others. Just like a low-rank-criminal in custody who keeps changing his story to acquit himself and tells of how some badass is to be blamed for the things he did. O, let me put it in a different perspective, a suspect removes doubt when he keeps revising. Think for a little while if you have become a "convicted criminal" or have remained a suspect. This cycle repeated itself, you waited until the next stir to claim entrapment again. Until you realised that you stretched it too far and changed the term to "stirring shit".
Suppose all the above is wrong, it isn´t ill-will, then, on what grounds did you base this entrapment accusation ? At no point did you go into the specifics in an in-depth manner. You did nothing to address this criticism by me. You never got around to clarify that. Your entrapment accusation was told and retold without substantiation and you presented it as the truth. By constant repetition, you hoped it will be accepted. Don´t whine about insults when you have been at it too. You focused on that but avoid the core of your accusation. You just skirt around it, by copying and pasting what I wrote and pretend that you thereby have supported your position with incriminating evidence. You need the correct algorithm to make a computer programme executable, likewise, when you embark on this path, you´d better show your train of thoughts. Don´t just pluck things out of air, if you do, you confirm it is really ill-will. And if you lie to me to acquit yourself again, be warned.
I know you will not make a worthwhile comment.
Leave and that will help you not to miss me. Else, to you go on barking insanely. silly dog. Its really simple, but u didn't get it.
