not_so_easy
New Member
having been a member for over 2 years..i still find that arrange by date is still ideal.
Reasons:
1) some forgotten what title they post, so after more than 72 hours, when they have time/remember to come back to read/post again, it is indeed tedious to do so. as not all the time they are free to check it out within the time frame of upto 72hours. some choose not to be informed thru their mails box too.
2) although some topic titles are the same, however, it is also tedious to check thru which suit their topic for discussion, in this case, a new topic is created and found to be repeatted somehow. also, poster may wish to read what has been replied or discussed on the topic they created, and but when there are no responses within the time frame, eventually, it may have been deleted/forgotten and remain redundant too.
3) some archieves are really too long. can all be standardised within 15posts.
maybe the matters of the heart should be the one to arrange in this chronological order? as for the others whereby you think is more ideal in alphabetical order, you can remain at it?
Reasons:
1) some forgotten what title they post, so after more than 72 hours, when they have time/remember to come back to read/post again, it is indeed tedious to do so. as not all the time they are free to check it out within the time frame of upto 72hours. some choose not to be informed thru their mails box too.
2) although some topic titles are the same, however, it is also tedious to check thru which suit their topic for discussion, in this case, a new topic is created and found to be repeatted somehow. also, poster may wish to read what has been replied or discussed on the topic they created, and but when there are no responses within the time frame, eventually, it may have been deleted/forgotten and remain redundant too.
3) some archieves are really too long. can all be standardised within 15posts.
maybe the matters of the heart should be the one to arrange in this chronological order? as for the others whereby you think is more ideal in alphabetical order, you can remain at it?